Mortgage Compliance

TRID Rules Put The Lender In Charge

TRID-Lender-in-charge-cfpb
0 0
Read Time:2 Minute, 35 Second

TRID-Lender-in-charge-cfpbWholesale lenders and brokers are looking to CFPB to clarify TRID rules for disclosures. Many hope this clarity will come with the new proposed rulemaking in July. For now, concern and confusion exist. (Disclosure)

Under the new rules, CFPB has made it quite clear that the lender making the loan is the entity responsible for compliance. The lender may delegate this responsibility to a Broker for the issuance of the initial Loan Estimate, or a Closing Agent for the Closing Disclosure. However, in either case, the lender remains totally responsible and accountable for getting things done right.

This has resulted in Wholesale Lenders requiring that they, the Wholesale Lender, issue the initial LE when a loan is originated by a Broker wishing to register the loan with them. Brokers say this ties their hands somewhat and ultimately may hurt the consumer. But, why?

If a Broker knows the various lenders with whom they may register their loans, then they will also know their related rates, fees, and charges. If the lender will allow them to issue the LE, it should reflect the information relative to the program offered by the intended lender. When the loan is closed by that lender the fees/charges should then be in tolerance.

Any change in lenders should only be done to benefit the consumer. If so, the rates/fees/charges of the new lender should be less than or equal to what is initially disclosed. No problem with the switch.

Otherwise, if any fees/charges are increased there needs to be a bona fide change in circumstances, like the borrower requesting the change or no longer qualifies for what was originally offered.  This shouldn’t create a major problem. Document the circumstance and issue a revised LE.

Brokers shouldn’t be “shopping” loans after they get an application. They should know the products available to them and their applicants so, when taking the application, they can place the loan with the correspondent offering the best deal.

The intent is to avoid any “bait & switch” tactics. CFPB doesn’t want a Broker issuing a low-ball LE and then registering the loan with a lender having higher or additional fees, costing the consumer more money at the closing.

CFPB wants transparency. They expect and require that, at closing, the consumer will get what was disclosed at application. No hidden fees or charges popping up at the last minute when it’s too late for the consumer to make a change.

To play it safe, Brokers may choose to deal with Correspondent Lenders that opt to issue the LE on behalf of the Broker. All the Broker need do is take the application and submit the information to the lender within 3 business days so the lender may issue the initial LE and take it from there. Of course, in such cases, the Broker loses some control of the transaction.

The alternative is for the Broker to become a Mortgage Banker. As a Mortgage Banker, they can be in charge… and assume all the compliance risks and responsibilities under TRID.

Michael Vitali

About the Author

Michael Vitali

Michael L. Vitali – Independent Consultant to the Mortgage Industry Mike Vitali is an independent consultant to the mortgage industry on matters concerning compliance and mortgage lending. He most recently served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer for LoanLogics, monitoring regulatory developments and their practical implications for the mortgage lending industry. His duties included research, interpretation, and analysis of existing and proposed legislation related to the industry in support of recommendations for policy and/or procedure changes to maintain continued quality and compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, investor requirements, and standard mortgage practices. In his more than 40 years in the mortgage industry, in senior level management, he has gained experience in all areas of mortgage lending, risk management, and compliance. Mike is a past President of the MBA of Greater Philadelphia, is a charter member and was the second Chairman of the MBA of Pennsylvania, and a past board member and Legislative Chair of both associations. He is a recipient of the 1998 Mortgage Banker of the Year Award from the MBA of Greater Philadelphia, and the 2003 Chairman's Award from the MBA of PA, and currently serves on several compliance related task forces for MBA.
Tagged ,
Michael Vitali

About Michael Vitali

Michael L. Vitali – Independent Consultant to the Mortgage Industry Mike Vitali is an independent consultant to the mortgage industry on matters concerning compliance and mortgage lending. He most recently served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer for LoanLogics, monitoring regulatory developments and their practical implications for the mortgage lending industry. His duties included research, interpretation, and analysis of existing and proposed legislation related to the industry in support of recommendations for policy and/or procedure changes to maintain continued quality and compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, investor requirements, and standard mortgage practices. In his more than 40 years in the mortgage industry, in senior level management, he has gained experience in all areas of mortgage lending, risk management, and compliance. Mike is a past President of the MBA of Greater Philadelphia, is a charter member and was the second Chairman of the MBA of Pennsylvania, and a past board member and Legislative Chair of both associations. He is a recipient of the 1998 Mortgage Banker of the Year Award from the MBA of Greater Philadelphia, and the 2003 Chairman's Award from the MBA of PA, and currently serves on several compliance related task forces for MBA.
View all posts by Michael Vitali →